The
Rev. Dr. Leah D. Schade, Ph.D.
Imagine being in a giant hall with 10,000 people from
80 different countries representing 50 different religions.
Everywhere you turn, there are women,
children and men wearing the distinct garb of their culture or faith. They are intermingling, shaking hands,
laughing, and embracing.
No weapons or
walls – just open doors and peace. Women
are no longer relegated the role of second-class citizens but are fully
recognized for their power, leadership, intelligence, and unique individual
gifts. Earth is also given equal status –
worthy of not only moral consideration, but lifted up as primary for our
concern and protection.
Invited to join in a vocalization of the “ohm,” you
feel the vibrations of a thousand vocal chords resonating in your own mouth, in
the air around you, and right in the center of your chest.
Later, Native peoples, so long pushed to the
margins, lead a procession in full tribal regalia, their booming drums setting
a beat that pulses through the air and into your heart. Hundreds of rooms offer glimpses into other
cultures, images of sacredness and holy rituals, and deep conversations about
healing our relationships with Earth and within the broken human
community.
This was what I experienced for five days at the
Parliament of World Religions in Salt Lake City Utah, in October of 2015. For that transcendent – as well as very localized
– moment in time and space, I got a glimpse of what I and many others agreed is
what we would hope to see in heaven (being careful to note that many of the
attendees would not use this Christian term).
It filled me with great hope in the possibilities for humanity on this
planet at a time when hope seems in very short supply.
Not only was I honored to be one of the presenters at
the Parliament, speaking about my book Creation-Crisis Preaching,
and preaching a sermon as the character of water in the story of the Woman at
the Well, but I also learned a great deal about other religions and gained
appreciation and insights as well.
One
of the most important experiences centered around a meal called Langar, hosted
by the Sikh community and served to the participants at the Parliament.
Every day for five days, the Sikhs served us
a healthy, delicious, vegetarian meal – all we could eat – for free.
They served 6000 people each afternoon. With our shoes removed and heads covered to
show respect, we sat together on the carpeted floor, all on the same level indicating
that everyone – no matter your skin color, economic level, gender, sexual
orientation, body size, or religions – everyone is welcome at this meal.
So I arrived home from the Parliament with renewed
hope for humanity based on what I had witnessed for five days. Peace, healing, reconciliation, cooperation
and justice are not only possible, they are happening.
Yet when started skimming through different websites
and posts about the Parliament, I came across a blogpost
by a fellow Christian who had attended the event and was alarmed by what
she saw. She accused the gathering of
being a New Age effort to create one world religion and one world government:
“The Parliament of the World's Religions has an
agenda and they are now very open about it. It is now an outright attack on the
Christian church and the Word of God. They have decided they cannot have unity
at all cost so they are trying something else: changing the doctrine of the
simple Gospel of Jesus and Who He is. I was handed a booklet titled Global Ethic: A Call
to our Guiding Institutions that
stated: ‘The Parliament of
the world’s religion seeks to promote interreligious harmony, rather than
unity.’ (p.1) http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/10/parliament-of-worlds-religions-2015.html
Not only does the blogger contradict herself (how can
the Parliament be seeking one world religion when it clearly states that they
are promoting not unity, but interreligious harmony?), but as a Christian, I
have to say that I did not feel attacked at all. And I daresay, neither did the other Lutherans who also attended the Parliament.
Lutherans gathered at the Parliament of World Religions 2015, including former Bishop Mark Hanson, top row, third from left. |
Also, I did not observe any proposed doctrinal
changes of the Gospel. Rather, I came
upon countless examples of people practicing one of the primary teachings of
the Gospel: Love the Lord your God (however
each person understands and expresses that love), and love one’s neighbor as
one’s self (Mark 12:30-31). Yet even
this practice of love was looked on with suspicion by the blogger:
“The propaganda pushed at these sessions was
love, love, love, but not for the Word of God. Peace, peace, peace, but only
after divisive ‘Christians are put in their place,’ wherever that may be.
Dialog, dialog, dialog; however, dialog is seen as divisive if you are a
dogmatic Bible believing old patriarchal Christian. . . . ‘Love’ is pushed
in all directions and is the end-all statement at all cost . . . In so many articles
and leaflets I have read ‘love’ even if it means leaving your faith! Love
becomes your highest priority. For all intents and purposes I will call them
the ‘Love Bombers.’ It draws the desperate into their web of deceit.” http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/10/parliament-of-worlds-religions-2015.html
So what, exactly, does
she think the point of the Word of God is, if not love? If Jesus clearly taught us even to love our
enemies (Matthew 5:33-34), then what was happening at the Parliament was
clearly in accordance with God’s will.
How heartening it was to see Muslims, Hindus, Jews, Christians –
traditions that each have a history of being in conflict with each other at one
time or another – sharing the stage in panel presentations, enjoying music and
dance, learning about each other’s cultures at booths and displays, and sharing
meals together. But this, too, was a
source of consternation:
“The common theme throughout the conference was
Muslims uniting with Jews, Catholics and Christians at all cost. Drop doctrine,
drop all differences to join together for the common core of one world
religion, and government - and everyone must be engaged in some sort of service
to be accountable in healing the earth.” http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/10/parliament-of-worlds-religions-2015.html
Just to be clear – there is absolutely no possibility of there being one world religion, nor one world government. Anyone who has worked in any substantive way in interfaith work, or at the United Nations, or in any joint international efforts will tell you – getting people of such varying cultures and religions to agree on anything is a commendable feat. To get them to agree on one religion and government – it’s simply not a feasible task, nor one with any chance of achievement. Nor should it be. The point is not to make the world one monoculture of religion, like a forest with all one kind of tree. The diversity of God’s Creation should be our first clue that the greatest strength of a community and humanity is its diversity. And rather than seeing it as a reason for attack, finally there are folks who are seeing diversity as a reason for celebration, for learning, for healing.
Just to be clear – there is absolutely no possibility of there being one world religion, nor one world government. Anyone who has worked in any substantive way in interfaith work, or at the United Nations, or in any joint international efforts will tell you – getting people of such varying cultures and religions to agree on anything is a commendable feat. To get them to agree on one religion and government – it’s simply not a feasible task, nor one with any chance of achievement. Nor should it be. The point is not to make the world one monoculture of religion, like a forest with all one kind of tree. The diversity of God’s Creation should be our first clue that the greatest strength of a community and humanity is its diversity. And rather than seeing it as a reason for attack, finally there are folks who are seeing diversity as a reason for celebration, for learning, for healing.
So how is it that two people, both Christians, can go
to the same place, see the same people, be exposed to the same events, hear the
same encouragements toward love, compassion and cooperation and arrive at such
radically different conclusions?
This difference in perception reminds me of the ending
of C.S. Lewis’ book, The Last Battle.
The book is the seventh and last book in the Narnia Chronicles, which is an
allegory-as-fantasy series of children’s books that contain the Christian
narrative set within an imagined world.
In the last chapter, the main characters find themselves in a beautiful
field with trees after the last battle with the anti-Christ figure, Tash. They marvel at what they see – a scene of
peace, hope, and beauty. But they are confused by the behavior of the dwarves
who do not appear to see the splendor all around them.
They sit in a tight circle refusing to look
around, or they bump blindly into the trees, cursing the beauty that is right
in front of them. No matter how many
times the group tries to help the dwarves to see, their vision remains
dark. When the lion Aslan (the
Christ-figure of the series) appears, he notes that that their prison is in
their own minds and that their fear of being "taken in" keeps them
from being taken out.
Similarly, the very things I and thousands of others
rejoiced in and uttered prayers of gratitude and relief for, were the cause of
nothing but consternation, suspicion, and fear for this Christian and many like
her. The beauty of interfaith
cooperation on the most pressing justice issues of our time is not a sign of
apostasy or heresy or the coming of one world religion, contrary to the
author’s fears.
Repeatedly emphasized
throughout the Parliament was the need to respect each person’s religious
expressions and convictions and to find ways to meet on ethical bridges in
order to right the wrongs of patriarchy, capitalism, racism, xenophobia,
sexism, and eco-cidal tendencies.
And yet, this Christian ended her blogpost this way:
“I never felt so helpless, but I realized this is
what the Lord meant the Way is narrow and few will find it. Christians are now
seen as mean and unknowledgable (sic), even while warning those to
get out of the fire. May the Lord Himself stifle their efforts and
open the ears of those in our path for Jesus Christ. We need to witness now
more than ever before, now before the door shuts and their time has run out.” http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2015/10/parliament-of-worlds-religions-2015.html
And there it is – fear for our (and her) soul, that an
eternal fire of judgment awaits anyone who is not a Christian the way she
believes Christianity must be practiced.
As social anthropologist Mary Douglas observed in her work, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the
Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, "Ideas about separating, purifying,
demarcating and punishing transgressions have as their main function to impose
system on an inherently untidy experience,” (4). For that Christian blogger, maintaining the
binary system of Christian/non-Christian and being sure to be in the right camp
is the primary goal.
Yes, the existence of thousands of different religions
throughout the world is untidy. But we
have choices as to how we will approach this messiness. According to Douglas, the tendency is to deal
with the anomalies and ambiguities by assigning arbitrary categories, avoiding
the messiness, labeling it as dangerous, or exacting physical control over it –
including violence, if necessary. We see
examples of these tendencies every day – and they are not working for our
planet or our human population. The
distance is short between imploring the Lord to stifle the efforts of peacemakers
and the decision to take matters into one’s own hands and do the stifling by
any means possible. This is the path to
terrorism, and it happens in nearly every religion.
But there is another way. Douglas notes that it is possible to see the
anomalies and ambiguities as sources to
enrich meaning or to call attention to other levels of existence. In other words, we can choose to see the
"other" not as a pollutant and therefore a danger, but creatively, as
a means by which our lives are enriched and our community expanded.
So, I, too offer my prayer
to the Lord that he himself will encourage and multiply our efforts and open
the ears of those in our path for the enemy-and-neighbor-love of Jesus
Christ. We need to witness now more than
ever before, now before the door shuts and our time has run out.
Cheryl Gentle and Leah Schade at the Climate Action booth. |
As my new friend, Cheryl Gentle, a woman who opened
her home to me and my roommate (and also new friend), Diane Johnson,
summarized:
“The message of the
Parliament was clear. We must work together ‘for a world of compassion, peace,
justice, and sustainability.’ The solution cannot be one faith but must be
interfaith. ‘The time is NOW and WE are the ones we’ve been waiting for!’”
Leah Schade and Dr. Diane Johnson, Organizational Consultant, http://www.mmapeu.com/ |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. If approved after review, it will be posted on the site.