Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Film Review: Merchants of Doubt: An Ecotheological Perspective


Film Review by The Rev. Dr. Leah D. Schade

            What voices do you listen to?  Are they voices filled with curiosity and truthfulness, or dripping with sarcasm and criticism?  What is the timbre of those voices?  Are they shrill and accusing?  Or forthright and honest?  When you listen to those voices, do they fill you with hope about what is possible, or do they cut off conversation with an edge of anger or cynicism?  The voices that fill our ears also fill our hearts and shape our mental responses to the world around us.  The voices we listen to can have an incredible effect on who we are, what we believe, and how we act.
Naomi Oreskes,
Professor of the History of Science and
Affiliated Professor of Earth and
Planetary Sciences at Harvard University  
Merchants of Doubt, based on the book Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway (Bloomsbury Press, 2011) is a well-executed documentary illustrating the phenomenon of the “spin” industry that has arisen to drown out the voices of scientists and researchers calling our attention to the dangers of everything from tobacco smoke to flame-retardant chemicals in furniture, from pesticides to CO2 emissions from fossil fuels.  Using the metaphor of the sleight-of-hand magician who creates illusions that distract an audience from reality, the film uses this through-line to effectively explain how public relations firms, advertising teams, lobbyists and industry front groups have distracted the public from the dangers of a long list of harmful products and polluting industries, including cigarettes, DDT, extreme energy extraction, and climate change.  As magician Jamy Ian Swiss explains in the film, “There’s a difference between magicians and the liars and charlatans. It offends me when someone takes my skills to distort and manipulate people.”  The use of Swiss to help narrate the film and provide the “huckster” hermeneutic through which to interpret and frame the stories of deception is one of the documentary’s strengths.  The film is visually and narratively compelling, leaving the viewer both angered and yet emboldened to take action to raise their own voice on behalf of the truth.  “Once revealed, never concealed,” as Swiss observes.
I would recommend this film to professors of environmental ethics to help students understand the alarmingly effective tactics used to sway public opinion about environmental issues, particularly climate disruption.  The film would also work well for environmental ministry teams at churches, synagogues, mosques, and other houses of worship looking for a captivating example of the moral and ethical dilemmas we face during this time of Creation-crisis.  I also encourage local environmental groups to host showings of the film in order to for citizens to understand the history of industry manipulation and begin to more critically engage those voices that claim to be “experts” in a given field, but, in fact, have little to no scientific credentials.
I was invited to view the film and be part of a panel discussion at the Campus Theatre in Lewisburg, PA, sponsored by Susquehanna Valley Progressives and the Rivertown Coalition for Clean Water and Clean Air.  As a pastor concerned with justice issues – particularly environmental threats – I viewed the film through an ecotheological lens.  As I watched the parade of “spin-meisters” and their successful attempts to either distort the truth about the dangers of extreme energy extraction, cover up or minimize the horror of the damage, or tell outright lies about the science of climate change, I was reminded of the words from Isaiah: “Woe is me!  I am lost, for I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips,” (Isaiah 6:5). We live in a time of manufactured realities peddled by these Merchants of Doubt who are profiting enormously from their brilliant tactics of deception.[1] I, myself, have to admit to my own “unclean lips” in my complicity as a consumer of goods and energy that lulls me into uncritically engaging in an economic system from which I benefit, while millions in impoverished communities bear the costs of my comfortable lifestyle.  The “unclean lips” in the movie gleefully admitted to the tactics they used to mislead the public and create illusions of doubt about the veracity of science.  It’s a pattern that, thanks to Oreskes and Conway, is being brought to light through careful and exhaustive research.
The scene from Isaiah continues with the prophet feeling the searing, yet cleansing, heat from the fiery ember of the altar fire placed on his tongue.  In the face of the world’s deception, a voice of divine authority asks Isaiah, "Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" To which we – individually, collectively, and as people of faith – can boldly answer in the prophets words: "Here am I; send me!" In other words, we can answer the call to announce the prophetic truth – that God is indeed the sovereign over all Creation, and we are called to be servants in this Earth-temple.  And that we, as the beloved Children and caretakers of this temple of Earth, will be held accountable for what we have done and what we have left undone.[2] 
Dr. James Hansen, climatologist
One particularly compelling figure from the film was the climate scientist Dr. James Hansen who reminded me of the prophet Isaiah.  Dr. Hansen worked for the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in 1988.  An unassuming, soft-spoken science-geek, his research indicated that our planet was experiencing the same kind of greenhouse effect as Venus.  All the carbon dioxide being released into the air from the burning of fossil fuels was like putting a blanket around the planet holding in the heat and destabilizing the atmosphere.  The warming climate draws in more moisture from the seas in what’s known as “positive feedback,” which intensifies the hurricanes and typhoons that form over the seas and oceans.  At the same time, the seas are rising because the polar ice caps are melting at a rate fast enough to inundate coastlands and swallow entire islands.
Immediately after testifying to this truth in Congress, Hansen and other scientists like him were attacked for their research.  Over the past 25 years climate scientists have received threatening and hate-filled emails, been mocked and lampooned in the press and on the Internet, and had their integrity as scientists questioned – an effort led not by other respected scientists but by lobbyists, so-called “think tanks,” PR firms, and industry front groups financed by the fossil fuel industry.  For many years, Hansen and other scientists shied away from these attacks, avoided any media altercations, and trusted that as their research was studied and shared with policy makers, steps would be taken to address the problem.  Instead, the amount of carbon dioxide has sky-rocketed as the public, industry and governments did either nothing or very little to respond to the data.
After years of keeping quiet, however, he realized that if he did not speak up, the truth simply would not be heard.  In an uncharacteristic display of boldness, Hanson has emerged as one of the primary voices speaking the truth and leading the movement to address the dangers of the climate crisis.  Like Isaiah whose tongue was seared by the burning ember, Dr. Hansen has joined climate protests and marches, speaks at events, and no longer cowers from the attacks of those with unclean lips.  He has consistently and forthrightly voiced the truth about the challenges we face. In his efforts to draw attention to this crisis, he has even been arrested during nonviolent demonstrations of civil disobedience. “You just have to say what you think is right,” Hansen has said in response to his critics. In other words, “Here am I.  Send me.” 
The other compelling figure in the film is Bob Inglis, a six-term Republican congressman who had been a climate-change denier until he witnessed first-hand the rapid changes in ecosystems across the globe due to the greenhouse effect and examined the ice core samples in the Arctic that tell the history of human-induced climate change.  
Bob Inglis, 6-term Republican Congressman
Like Paul in the book of Acts who experienced a conversion after hearing the voice of the risen Christ, Inglis experienced a “climate-change conversion”  and has taken the message of climate change to his constituents – and suffered the consequences.  Because this message did not square with the “tribe” of conservative Republicans and their ideology, Inglis was ousted from his seat and ostracized from the Party. 
What Inglis discovered is just how effective the frame of “freedom” is in swaying Americans away from heeding the message about danger.  When regulations against cigarettes were on the horizon in the 60s and 70s, the message was: we can’t let them take away our “freedom” to smoke.  This ideal of freedom is at the heart of what it means to be American and has been brilliantly maneuvered into galvanizing the public against regulations that would actually be in their best interest.  As the film shows, any regulation that aims to protect public health and well-being (but threaten corporate profits) can be spun as an infringement on freedom.  This has worked for gun regulation, climate regulation, air pollution regulation, nutrition regulation, and every other attempt to reign in those industries that off-load the true costs of their businesses (loss of health, property, clean air, water and land) onto the public.  Ironically, as Inglis points out, people who don't like big government are going to get more of it.  Billions of dollars will be spent by the government to deal with catastrophic weather events, climate-refugees, and wars over access to land, water and resources – all of which are directly affected by climate disruption.  “People are going to die - that's why it matters,” says Inglis. “We're running out of time to prevent a train wreck.”
The film does end on a note of hope and empowerment, with the message:  you don't have to accept things the way they are.  “The lie is that we can't innovate, that we have to rely on fossil fuels,” says Inglis.  “I want to be part of saying:  We did rise.”  Sometimes the voice of God comes to us in unexpected ways, saying unexpected things.  Sometimes the truth is hard to say, and even harder to hear and accept.  But when that truth is spoken in love, when it is spoken with an open heart and mind, with no agenda other than to share that truth and make things better, it has incredible power. 
The Good News is that the voices of the prophets, the voice of Jesus, inspire us to raise our own prophetic voice.  “You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free,” as the Teacher said (John 8:32).  Of course, the truth is going to hurt like hell first.  But only by acknowledging this truth can we get down to the hard work of healing and rectifying the wrongs we have done.  The divine voice is not calling for us to run and hide, or lie about the truth, or be cynical and jaded about this world.  The voice of divine authority calls us into relationship with each other, with Creation, with our community.  Whether that voice comes to you through the words of a climate-converted politician, or the soft-spoken words of a scientist, or the tough-love words of a pastor – God’s voice is still speaking.  And with the courage of Isaiah we can respond:  Here am I – send me!  Send us!











[1] See also the short documentary film by Josh Fox, The Sky is Pink, recounting the deliberate attempts of the fracking industry to deceive the public about the dangers of shale gas drilling:  http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/sky-pink/.
[2] See Pope Francis’ injunction against those who harm God’s Creation:  “God Will Judge You on Whether You Cared for Earth” http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_REL_VATICAN_CLIMATE_CHANGE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT  

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Our Earth is a "House Divided" in Need of Repair and Healing


Care for Creation Commentary on the Common Lectionary

by Leah D. Schade

June 7, Year B

Texts: Genesis 3:8-15; Psalm 130; 2 Corinthians 4:13 – 5:1; Mark 3:20-35

“If a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand,” (Mark 3:25).  So notes Jesus when answering accusations that he is in league with demonic forces and drawing on them for his power to exorcise those same spirits.  The readings today can be explored through an ecohermeneutic with the following question:  What does it mean to live in a house divided against itself?

It is worth noting that the Greek word for house is oikos, from which we derive words such as “ecology” and “economy.”  When we think of the “house” in expanded terms to include the very Earth itself – the household we share with our Earth-kin – we can see that there has been a disconnect between humanity and God's Creation. Human beings are spiritually alienated from the soil, the water, the flora and the fauna of the planet we call home. A rupture in the relationship has divorced us from those with whom we share this oikos. 
Rubbish dumped on the tundra outside llulissat in Greenland stand in stark contrast to icebergs behind from the Sermeq Kujullaq or llulissat Ice fjord – a Unesco world heritage site. Photograph: Global Warming Images/WWF-Canon. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/29/earth-lost-50-wildlife-in-40-years-wwf
 
Whence began this rupture that has so divided the house?  The iconic story in Genesis 3 provides valuable insights.

Most people see this story as the explanation for the concept of Original Sin - the doctrine that all human beings are born into a sinful state because of the fall of Adam and Eve due to their decision to eat from the Tree of Knowledge.  But there is another way to view this story.  The preacher may want to shift the traditional interpretation of the story of “The Fall” from mere anthropocentric sin to that of original anthropogenic sin – humanity’s first crime against nature. The myth of the “fall” of human beings has specific application to the current environmental crisis. This story shows us that God set out limits for human beings in how they were to exist in the garden. For the good of Adam and Eve, for the good of the tree, for the good of the entire garden, God essentially said: “This far and no farther.” God established a boundary for the mutual protection of the relationship between humankind and the created world.

But the original humans neither respected these boundaries nor obeyed the limits God set for them. They ignored the warnings, flouted the rules, and crossed the line. There’s almost a feeling of entitlement we sense from Eve and Adam’s rationalization of their disobedience. It’s as if they’re saying, “This is our garden after all. God gave it to us. We should be allowed to do anything we want with it. Look, the fruit is good to eat. It will make us smarter, better, richer. God just doesn’t want us to be like God. God’s afraid we’ll know what God knows. And why shouldn’t we?”

And because of this arrogance, there is an immediate cascade of events that shatters the relationships of paradise. The humans hide from God, and are not honest with God or themselves. They blame each other, and they blame one of God’s creatures for the temptation. They refuse to accept responsibility for what has happened, but the consequences are unavoidable. The house is now divided.  From that point on, their relationship with the earth is cursed: "Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life." (Genesis 3:17b , RSV). All because of human beings’ insistence that we can have whatever we want whenever we want it, no matter what the cost or the consequence.

And now this house that has been divided against itself is collapsing.  Our preaching must honestly name the truth that we see around us by pointing out the ways in which our anthropogenic sin is polluting the air, water and land. 
 
 
In Lutheran theological terms, this is the Law we must articulate in order for the mirror to be held up to what is really there.  Only by honestly confronting this reality can we open ourselves to Jesus’ power and begin to counteract the demonic forces at work.  In the words of Tom Ravetz in the Journal for the Renewal of Religion and Theology, we “can accept the reality of the situation without flinching because we see its place in the development of the world. We see, too, where we can help to redeem it, letting its deeper meaning shine forth. We can accept the reality of the dying earth, because we know that we are engaged in its re-enlivening.”[1]

Rather than speak about this rupture in a general way, the preacher would do well to refer to a context-specific environmental problem which will concretize the message for listeners.  For example, what is a local waterway or abandoned lot, or brownfield site, or air quality issue that has an impact on the hearers’ lives and community?  In what ways has this issue caused a rupture in the oikos and harmed the kin of the household?

Take care that the sermon does not end with guilt-inducing Law that leaves the listener without hope. Rather, our preaching must proclaim God’s intention and action to heal and restore the oikos. For instance, what are things that are being done, or have been done, to address the problem?  What local groups are pulling trash out of the river?  What legislation is being proposed to address the air quality issue?  What faith communities have come together to plant community gardens to help feed their neighbors?  Knowing that this work is being done – and inviting listeners to join in those efforts – helps proclaim the Gospel so that the faithful recognize the “sisters, brothers and mothers” of Jesus doing the work to repair the ruptures, heal the wounds, and set the house aright.
Zach Stotter, organizer of the Susquehanna River Cleanup, brings a boat load of garbage to shore during a clean-up event on May 2, 2015.  http://www.dailyitem.com/news/more-than-volunteers-comb-susquehanna-river-for-refuse/article_56ce7f04-f11b-11e4-8e79-7fdac3cb9579.html
 
By lifting up these instances of hope, we realize that, in fact, Jesus is not aligned with the demonic, but with the divine.  All of his miracles, exorcisms, teachings, and walk to Calvary clearly demonstrate his commitment not to dividing the house, but uniting it under God’s healing love.  It is that love that enables us to wait, as Psalm 130 entreats us, and not to lose heart, as Paul encourages us.


[1] Tom Ravetz, "Reenlivening the Dying Earth," Journal for the Renewal of Religion and Theology December 2006.


This commentary can also be accessed at the website for Lutherans Restoring Creation, an excellent resource for ecological theology in worship and preaching.
http://www.lutheransrestoringcreation.org/the-second-sunday-after-pentecost-in-year-b-2015

Friday, May 29, 2015

Ecotheological Reflection on the Holy Trinity


Care for Creation Commentary on the Common Lectionary

by Leah D. Schade

 Trinity Sunday, Year B

 Readings: Isaiah 6:1-8; Psalm 29; Romans 8:12-17; John 3:1-17

(This commentary is also found at Lutherans Restoring Creation, an excellent resource for ecotheological approaches to worship and preaching.  http://www.lutheransrestoringcreation.org/trinity-sunday-in-year-b-2105) 

            The Isaiah text and Psalm 29 for Trinity Sunday contain strong, masculine images of a king seated on his throne above Creation, exercising his power in magnificent, yet frightening ways.  God speaks and the voice is like thunder over the waters, resonating with enough force to break trees and send entire countries running like scared young animals.  The personification of the deity as a mighty ruler whose power flashes like lightning and whips up catastrophic storms on a whim is common across many religions.  Yet in light of earthquakes, typhoons, hurricanes, and other natural events that can shatter lives, communities, and nearly entire countries, we must be careful not to attribute such occurrences to a capricious deity who appears to arbitrarily wreak havoc on Earth.  If this is who our Triune God is and what this Abba/Father does, our awe may turn to abject fear, and there may be little reason to trust and love such a God.

A better way to explore the concept of the Trinity is provided by theologian Elizabeth Johnson, who, in her authoritative and preeminent work She Who Is, seeks to appreciatively uncover, recover and assess those classic theological resources that may fund a feminist theology (Elizabeth A. Johnson, She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse, New York: Crossroad, 1992).  For example, she draws on the Cappadocian Fathers’ idea of the perichoresis, or mutual in-dwelling of the persons of the Trinity, to describe a three-way partnership that is fully relational with each other and with the world.

At the same time, she is not hesitant to point out the way our forefathers in theology created a religious system that inscribes patriarchy into all aspects of the faith.  Drawing on the work of Elisabeth Schüssler-Fiorenza, Sallie McFague and Rosemary Radford Ruether, Johnson recognizes the importance of language to both name and create reality. She beckons us to expand our images of the Trinity and offers us new ways to understand our triune God’s relationship to humanity and nature.  She insists that Sophia, the female personification of Holy Wisdom, can and should be the lens through which the Trinity is viewed, as well as the language through which we speak and hear about God.  Thus she coins the terms Spirit-Sophia, Jesus-Sophia and Mother-Sophia as an alternative Trinitarian formulation which places Wisdom/Sophia as the primary metaphor.

According to Johnson, the Church is the most obvious candidate for modeling what it means to answer Wisdom’s call to undergo transformative attention to those most vulnerable, including the species, habitats, and human beings most threatened by oppression, and to take responsibility for the health and respectful treatment of all Creation.  As Johnson describes:
 
Alive in the koinonia of SHE WHO IS, women and men are called to be friends of God and prophets, that is, appreciators of her wonders, sympathizers with her resistance to whatever degrades beloved creation, companions to her passion for the world's flourishing, starting with the nearest neighbor in need and extending to the farthest flung system by which we order, or disorder, our common life. (She Who Is, 244).

Johnson also suggests that Jesus reimaged as Jesus-Sophia can be understood as Wisdom incarnate, thus joining him with the Hebrew feminine images of shekinah and ruah. Seeing a connection between the Greek masculine logos, or Word of God, and Hebrew shekinah/ruah, or Spirit of God, she argues for the recovery of the feminine Sophia in order to counterbalance the preponderance of male imagery so often associated with the Trinity.  This is an especially poignant insight when considering John’s Gospel, which is replete with references to the logos, while often presenting Jesus as a Wisdom figure along the lines of Lady Sophia from Proverbs.

            So if the “voice” of the Triune God is more than a masculine roar triggering cataclysmic events, how might we recalibrate our hermeneutic for hearing the “voice” of SHE WHO IS, Spirit-Sophia, Jesus-Sophia and Mother-Sophia?  One way is to remind listeners that if we listen to the voice of Jesus-Sophia, we will clearly hear that God is not intent on inflicting pain and suffering on Creation, inclusive of humanity.  How do we know this?  Because, as Jesus-Sophia clearly stated, “God so loved the world,” (John 3:16, emphasis added).  The Greek word here is cosmos – meaning not just the human “world,” but all of Creation.  Thus God is not intending to destroy that which God loves.  Nor does God intend for humans to destroy what God loves.  Rather, God intends to redeem all of Creation, which serves as a model for humans to care for what God loves as well. 

            At this point, the sermon might invoke the image of the searing, yet cleansing, heat from the fiery ember placed on the prophet Isaiah’s tongue.  We know our own lips are unclean and that we live among a people of unclean lips, especially regarding the realities of environmental devastation. The successful attempts to either “spin” the truth about the dangers of extreme energy extraction, cover up or minimize the horror of the damage, or tell outright lies about the science of climate change illustrate the ways in which we live in a time of manufactured realities peddled by the “Merchants of Doubt” (referring to both the book and documentary by Naomi Oreskes [see http://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/].[1]

In the face of such deception, we hear the voice of our Triune God asking, "Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" (note the plural pronoun, which lends itself well to a perichoretic model of the Trinity!). To which we – individually, collectively, and as people of faith – can boldly answer: "Here am I; send me!" In other words, we can answer the call to announce the prophetic truth – that God is indeed the sovereign over all Creation, and we are called to be servants in this Earth-temple.  And that we, as the beloved Children and caretakers of this temple of Earth, will be held accountable for what we have done and what we have left undone.[2]  The sermon should encourage listeners to bravely join their voices and efforts with others to speak truth to power and work on behalf of Earth and those most vulnerable.  

Here the preacher may echo the call for collective action – in this case, inviting listeners to write down concrete actions they can take for caring for Creation, thus increasing their level of commitment and participation. Other possibilities for listeners to live out the Gospel might include asking them to sign a petition stating their support for a piece of environmental legislation, or signing up for a road clean-up, or taking part in a field trip to a local creek. In any case, such a sermon might use more direct language to state the need for action in the face of environmental degradation and call on listeners to respond with the courage of Isaiah:  Here am I – send me!  Send us!

The Rev. Dr. Leah Schade in Washington D.C. doing advocacy work for higher mercury emission standards for the coal industry, 2011.
 



[1] See also the short documentary film by Josh Fox, The Sky is Pink, recounting the deliberate attempts of the fracking industry to deceive the public about the dangers of shale gas drilling:  http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/sky-pink/.
[2] See Pope Francis’ injunction against those who harm God’s Creation:  “God Will Judge You on Whether You Cared for Earth” http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_REL_VATICAN_CLIMATE_CHANGE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT 

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Day of Pentecost: Ecotheological Reflection



Readings for Year B – 2014-15
Care for Creation Commentary on the Common Lectionary
by Leah D. Schade

Day of Pentecost, Year B


Ezekiel 37:1-14 (alternate reading)
Psalm 104:24-34, 35b
Acts 2:1-21
John 15:26-27

Fire and wind are strong symbols for the Day of Pentecost.  The image of the tongues of fire from the Holy Spirit lighting the air above each of the disciples gathered in the upper room of Jerusalem is iconic.  This sacred fire has the power to ignite a revolution of justice, to enable a provincial person to suddenly speak to another from a foreign land, to provide light in a place of darkness simply by being a presence there.  Yet as with any symbol of power, we must also recognize that fire has an equally destructive potential that, if used with selfish or thoughtless intentions, can wreak incredible damage.

For example, we encounter “tongues of fire” of a wholly different and sinister kind when we see the “flaring” of toxic gases near shale gas drilling sites and oil refineries.   

A gas flare burns at a fracking site in rural Bradford County, Pennsylvania. Photograph: Les Stone/REUTERS
This is an unholy fire, contributing not only dangerous greenhouse gases into the already compromised atmosphere, but also releasing hundreds of toxins such as benzene, naphthalene, styrene, toluene and xylene, all of which cause serious health problems.  Thus we must be careful to distinguish between the spiritual fire that God intends for the illumination of our hearts and minds, and the fires that come from burning fossil fuels that have created our climate crisis.

Wind is the other elemental symbol that invokes great power on this day of Pentecost. Again, we know that wind can have both positive and negative effects.  In a stale room cut off from ventilation, opening a window fills the space with fresh air.  A hot summer day is more bearable when just a zephyr blows across our sweated brow, cooling our bodies. 

But the power of wind to destroy through hurricanes, tornadoes, and other extreme weather events is a reminder that the elements cannot be contained nor controlled.  And yet, it is our human activity that has so affected the weather in ways we would never have thought possible as a species on this planet.  Talk about the weather is no longer just an exchange of pleasantries as we collectively recognize the “global weirding” going on around us.  

 “Nature at the end of the twentieth century, as [Bill] McKibben has so cogently argued, can only be understood as a product of human agency. Thus its destructiveness cannot be understood as [divine] judgment but rather as that for which we will be judged,” Catherine Keller states in her essay, “Talk about the Weather: The Greening of Eschatology,” (Ecofeminism and the Sacred, edited by Carol J. Adams, New York: Continuum, 1993).  The wind of the Holy Spirit bears witness not just to God’s continual efforts of renewal, but humanity’s relentless imposition of its own will on this planet.

Another way to approach the lectionary readings for Pentecost is to provide an ecohermeneutical reading of the “dry bones” from Ezekiel.  While the ancient Israelites would have originally heard this story in the context of the Babylonian captivity as a vision of God’s restoration of the people, a contemporary reading finds a different kind of captivity.  Ironicallyit is the “bones” of the fossilized remains of dinosaurs and other lifeformsthat roamed the earth during the Cretaceous Period millions of years ago thathave been used to power our human society today.  



The challenge for the preacher will be to help listeners understand that the same Holy Spirit, or ruah (God’s breath) that fills our lungs today is the same ruah that gave life to the thundering lizards millions of years ago.  In our insistence on using fossil fuels, not only are we undoing the best carbon sequestering system God could have ever designed (as theologian Barbara Rossing has put it), but there is something deeply sacrilegious about drilling into the remains of the sacred burial grounds of these fossilized remains and burning them for our own purposes.  “Can these bones live?”  The fossil fuel industry has put an end to that question, commodifying the depths of Earth and creating a planet captive to greenhouse gases.

And yet all around us blow the winds of the Spirit that (along with other clean forms of energy such as solar and geothermal) have tremendous capacity for creating the energy we need without disrupting the climate system of the planet.  


 And like the disciples in that upper room, there are more and more individuals carrying the message of forgiveness and hope that comes from the Spirit.  The efforts of the few urging us to turn from our ecological sin and embrace Earth-honoring strategies is creating a Pentecost-like moment in human consciousness.  “What must we do?” more and more people are asking.  And through collaboration and community-building, we are finding surprising answers to that question.
 
One way to frame a sermon for this day is to remind listeners that just as the wind from God brought about renewal and a reforming of God’s people in the Bible, so has the Church experienced those same winds of change.  The Protestant Reformation was a time of much upheaval but also incredible inspiration (notice the play on words – in-spire, “breath in”) that led to the renewal of faith for generations of Christians to the present day.

Lutheran preachers can remind their congregations that as we are approaching the 500th anniversary of the Reformation in 2017, the winds of the Holy Spirit are again moving us to renewal. After having laid out the problem of environmental devastation and climate disruption in the first part of the sermon, the second part can share the ways in which the church is seeking to address these issues by calling for a continual re-formation that includes Creation care and attention to ecological justice issues (http://www.lutheransrestoringcreation.org/500th-anniversary-of-the-reformation).
Preachers from other denominations can make reference to the ecotheological work done within their own denominations.  Make the good news of this renewal real for listeners by highlighting ways that congregations are helping to revitalize themselves and the larger Church with outreach projects such as installing solar panels and creating community gardens (see http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=12519).

The sermon could end by inviting congregants to think about ways in which their own congregation could experience the renewal of the Holy Spirit by incorporating Creation care into their ministry.  Challenge them to create a green visioning team to imagine what their church will look like in five or ten years if they throw open the windows and allow the Holy Spirit to blow across their brows, tussle their hair, and fill their lungs with the refreshing wind of new life.

This reflection can also be found at the Lutherans Restoring Creation website, which you can visit for weekly ecotheological scripture reflections:  http://www.lutheransrestoringcreation.org/the-day-of-pentecost-in-year-b-1