Refusing
to be Consoled:
Climate
Change and the Modern-day Slaughter of the Innocents
First
Sunday of Christmas 2016
The Rev. Dr. Leah D. Schade
Assistant
Professor of Preaching and Worship
Lexington
Theological Seminary, Lexington, KY
Author,
Creation-Crisis
Preaching:
Ecology, Theology and the Pulpit (Chalice Press, 2016)
Text: Matthew 2:13-23
"A
voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud lamentation, Rachel weeping for her
children; she refused to be consoled, because they are no more." Matthew 2:18 (NRSV)
This stark scene of children’s bodies lying limp in their mothers’ arms comes crashing into our silent and holy nights of Christmas peace and joy. Last week was the time for celebration and the sweet smell of a newborn’s skin. This week is different. Because here we have the juxtaposition of the state-sanctioned murder of babies and toddlers against the images we cherish of Mary holding her precious baby boy in swaddling clothes. The jarring contrast is almost too much to bear. We squirm in our pews and anxiously wait for the reading to be over, and hope that the preacher won’t make us think about these acts of evil perpetrated against the innocent.
But this story is part of the Christmas saga. And it contains an awful truth. As much as we repeat the all-too-familiar
adage about Jesus dying for us to save us from our sin, this passage from
Matthew confronts us with one very difficult reality that we can’t ignore:
All those baby boys died
because the baby Jesus lived.
Jesus escaped with his
life. Those children died.
Mary cradled her son
safely in her arms far away.
Hundreds of other mothers cradled their dead babies in their arms with
excruciating cries of grief.
Most of them probably did not even know why the
soldiers descended into their town, burst through their doors and reached into
the cradles. But we know. A despotic ruler crazed with anger kills all the other children because the one he wanted got
away. A generation of children paid
for Jesus’ life with their own.
Some will say that this story about the “Slaughter of
the Innocents,” as it’s come to be called, simply can’t be true. Some scholars say that there is no indication
in the historical records of such a genocide taking place. And that may be the case. Or it may be that the murder of Jewish babies
just wasn’t important enough to make the headlines. It wouldn’t be the first time that the
erasure of hundreds of lives by thugs-in-power simply went unnoticed or ignored.
As we listen to this Bible story today, we can’t help
but hear Rachel’s wailing and loud lamentation rising not just from Bethlehem,
but from other places around the world.
We hear those anguished cries piercing our ears and our hearts from the
dust and rubble in Aleppo, Syria. As I
scroll through my Facebook page and see the pictures of a city bombed to sandy
piles of rubble, all vegetation gone, I come upon a video of a hospital where
children who have survived the latest round of bombs are sitting on gurneys. Their faces are dusty and blood-caked but
oddly quiet. They have no tears. But the
adults around them wail in grief. One
teenage boy comes in cradling a baby in his arms. But the baby does not move, because his tiny
body had been smothered in the rubble.
The teenager has already lost his parents and now clings to this little
body, crying like Rachel in Ramah.
Do you know why Rachel was crying? Genesis 35:16-20
relates that Rachel, one of Jacob’s wives, died in childbirth on the road from
Bethel to Bethlehem. Her midwife tried to comfort her with the news that she
had born a son – the one who would be called Benjamin. So there is a bittersweet quality to her
tears.
But in Jeremiah 31:15, Rachel
becomes a symbol for all of Israel who mourns the loss of their dead after
returning from exile and captivity in Babylon:
15 Thus says the Lord:
A voice is heard in Ramah,
lamentation and bitter weeping.
Rachel is weeping for her children;
she refuses to be comforted for her children,
because they are no more.
A voice is heard in Ramah,
lamentation and bitter weeping.
Rachel is weeping for her children;
she refuses to be comforted for her children,
because they are no more.
In quoting this passage from
Jeremiah, Matthew takes it one step further with the image of Rachel weeping in
her grave at Ramah over the horrendous events taking place in Bethlehem.
We want to move on quickly from this story, to go back
to our holiday celebrations, playing with our shiny new toys. But Rachel’s cries do not fade when we close
the covers of our Bibles and walk out of the church service. In Aleppo, in Sudan and Kenya, in Somalia,
Columbia, Ukraine, North Korea, and Afghanistan, and so many other countries we
see that war, gang violence, poverty, and rulers even worse than Herod are
killing children and ravaging families around the world.
We’d like to think that Rachel’s cries from these
places, while heart-rending, are not our fault.
But actually we are partially responsible. What most people don’t realize is the role that climate disruption and
environmental devastation have played in exacerbating the situations in Aleppo
and other war-torn areas. Which means
that those of us who live in countries that have burned the most fossil fuels
share some responsibility for the carnage.
Alex Randall of the Climate and Migration Coalition
notes that “Problems arise when patterns of climate-driven migration collide
with existing violence.” Rafael Malpica
Padilla, executive director for ELCA Global Mission concurs: “As never seen
before, over 62 million persons have been displaced from their home by
violence, poverty and economic marginalization . . . But lately we have seen
the huge impact climate change is having on people’s lives,” (K. T. Sancken,“Seeing Jesus in the face of the other,” The Lutheran Magazine, November 2016, 15).
https://thinkprogress.org/veterans-day-2030-could-look-like-syria-today-thanks-to-climate-change-1e4afafd523#.vep2f4qaw |
Climate change leads to drought and increased crop
damage from insect infestations and blights in some places, which drives
farmers away from the land and leads to uprisings. In other
places, rising sea levels cause entire towns and island populations to
relocate. When this many people are
forcibly displaced from their homes – a number higher than it has been at any
time since World War II – it creates the conditions for corruption, violence, and
authoritarian regimes thrive.
CREDIT: AP PHOTO/ALEPPO MEDIA CENTER AMC |
War, in turn, consumes resources and destroys
infrastructure which in turn intensifies the cycle of misery for those trapped
in these areas. Diseases like cholera and other water-borne illnesses hit
children’s bodies the hardest. Rachel’s
tears weep for the babies whose bodies are depleted by intestinal
illnesses, malnutrition, and disease; for the children whose fragile lives are cut short by war and violence, leaving them limp in their mother’s arms.
How are we to engage this kind of suffering? How do we avoid the sin of avoidance and the
passive evil of complacency on the one hand, without getting overwhelmed with
despair on the other?
Our way through this double-bind is illuminated by a
Word from God. There remains the
proclamation of hope and the call to action.
In Jeremiah 31, after acknowledging the unimaginable pain of Rachel, the
voice of God says this:
16 Thus
says the Lord:
Keep your voice from weeping,
and your eyes from tears;
for there is a reward for your work, says the Lord:
they shall come back from the land of the enemy;
17 there is hope for your future, says the Lord:
your children shall come back to their own country.
Keep your voice from weeping,
and your eyes from tears;
for there is a reward for your work, says the Lord:
they shall come back from the land of the enemy;
17 there is hope for your future, says the Lord:
your children shall come back to their own country.
This is what they want, all those who have been displaced
– refugees, migrant workers, and those we incorrectly label “illegal” – all of
them want to find a home. They want to
live in peace. They want to raise their children and grow
their food and drink clean water and have access to basic health care,
education, and governments free of violence and corruption. They want to have meaningful work with enough
money to live comfortably and to pray in their houses of worship. Isn’t that what you want for yourself, what
you want for your own children? Which
means they are not so different than you and me.
And so there stands before us today the choice of how
to respond to what we have seen and heard.
If we are to be part of the fulfillment of God’s words of promise to
Rachel and all mothers who long for restoration, then we as Christians and as
the Church must take seriously what our role is in this world of Rachels who
cannot be consoled with mere words. As
we begin a new year, this is an opportune time to think about what we can do
both individually and collectively to help those in crisis – a crisis that we
are partially, though unwittingly responsible for. We may not be in a position to prevent the
immediate bloodshed, but we can do two things – we can advocate for displaced
persons, and we address the long-term causes that are contributing to the conditions
of displacement in the first place.
Jennifer Crist is a friend of mine who is an ELCA mission
developer in Harrisburg, Pa., and has done incredible
work with children in Guatemala through Tree4Hope for over a decade. She says, “I really want people and
congregations in the U.S. to know that there are so many things that they can
do.” She acknowledges that while there
are huge systemic problems, “we as a church have such a great asset in having
the ELCA Advocacy office and the AMMPARO
strategy.” AMMPARO (which is a play on the Spanish word amparo which means “refuge”) stands for
Accompanying Migrant Minors with Protection, Advocacy, Representation and
Opportunities. It is a strategy approved by the 2016 Churchwide Assembly to
work with organizations to provide legal assistance, community outreach and
family reunification to migrants who are in the U.S. In 2017, maybe your church can consider doing
a study about similar kinds of accompaniment strategies and discern where God may be calling
you to give “hope for their future” (Jeremiah 31:17).
Or perhaps your church can organize a teach-in to help
people learn about the effects of climate
change and the ways in which it contributes to and exacerbates
the refugee crises across the globe. And then work on ways
you and your congregation can help address climate change,
including communicating with your local elected officials on the need to adapt
measures to mitigate climate disruption.
Or your church may decide to partner with organizations to help resettle families in your local area (Lutherans can contact Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services (LIRS).
For example, Gethesemane
Lutheran, the congregation in which I now worship, has been
working with other neighboring Lutheran churches to collect household items for
refugees who will be settling in the Lexington area. And a church I once served in Media, Pa., not
only collected household items, but also organized volunteers to be
translators, help find jobs, and navigate the complexities of becoming U.S.
citizens, of settling into their new home.
At the very least, our sermons and Sunday School
lessons must discourage the use of disparaging language when talking about the
human beings who are fleeing desperate situations in their home countries. They are not “illegal.” The religion they practice does not make them
“terrorists.” And the color of their
skin does not make their lives any less valuable than those of us with white
skin.
As Christians who are celebrating the Nativity, we
have to remember that Jesus’ birth came at a price. But it’s obvious from the
life he lived and the death he suffered that he did not forget all those babies
who lost their lives.
When the disciples wanted
to shoo the children away from Jesus, his rebuke of them was stern because he
knew that a generation of children had already been lost: “Let the little
children come to me, and do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the
kingdom of heaven belongs,” (Matthew 19:14).
When his disciples were
arguing about who was the greatest among them, Jesus reached out for a little
child as an example of the ones who are the models of greatness in God’s Kingdom
(Matthew 19:1-4). He did not forget
those babies who had been murdered.
Even his dying request
for the Beloved disciple to care for his mother Mary shows that the cries of
Rachel weeping for her children were not far from his mind (John 19:26-27).
Of course we know that despotic rulers are still
killing children. Soldiers are still
murdering babies. Belligerent leaders
are still denying climate change and refusing to act to mitigate its
effects. Facebook posts and Twitter
feeds are still spewing forth hatred of immigrants, refugees, and desperate
people seeking to escape the horrors that have taken over their homelands.
But the Word of God still calls to us. The Church still stands. Your congregation has work to do. And you have a role in the Kingdom of
God. Listening to Rachel’s cries is part
of our work. Taking action on refugee
issues and climate issues and immigration issues is an extension of our
Christian faith. As Malpica Padilla
reminds us, Matthew 25 is the test of whether or not we will see the face of
Jesus in these children in Aleppo, in Sudan, in Guatemala. “We see Jesus in the face of the other, the
vulnerable others, the refugee others, the marginalized others. At the end of the day, we will be judged not
by how much theology we know or how good our doctrine is, but how we have cared
for the vulnerable ones,” (Sancken, 19).
Jesus has heard the cries of these children and their mothers. And Jesus is opening our ears, our eyes, our
hearts to hear them, and to respond in faith.
Amen.
Looking for more ideas for preaching that addresses climate change and other environmental justice issues? Check out http://www.creationcrisispreaching.com/.
Sources:
Sancken, K. T. “Seeing Jesus in the face of the
other,” The Lutheran Magazine,
November 2016. http://www.livinglutheran.org/2016/11/seeing-jesus-in-the-face-of-the-other/
Randall, Alex, “The role of climate change in the
Syria crisis: how the media got it wrong,” New
Internationalist, June 10, 2016. https://newint.org/blog/2016/06/10/climate-change-and-the-syria-crisis/, accessed Dec. 23, 2016.
Romm, Joe, "Veterans Day 2030 Could Look Like Syria Today, Thanks To Climate Change," ThinkProgress, Nov. 11, 2015, https://thinkprogress.org/veterans-day-2030-could-look-like-syria-today-thanks-to-climate-change-1e4afafd523#.vep2f4qaw; accessed Dec. 27, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. If approved after review, it will be posted on the site.