Leah D. Schade
Trump’s “presidential” speech to the joint session of
Congress on Feb. 28 was a brilliant move.
He stayed with his script, was calm and measured, and offered one gem of
grace
and dignity. Both Republicans
and even some Democrats gave high
ratings. The Dow Jones Industrial
Average soared to new heights. The bipartisan
crowd went wild. And that’s why this speech presents a new kind of danger.
The problem is that this speech is but one – perhaps the
only one – time in Trump’s political career when he had any modicum of decorum
and propriety. When the bar is set so
low, anything looking remotely better than his typical blustery hate-speech can
suddenly be characterized as “unifying” and “optimistic.” The result is that even some who have been
battered by Trump’s campaign (including the major media outlets) and targeted
by the executive orders and rhetoric of his first six weeks in office are so
grateful for a moment of relief, they appear to be lured into thinking that
maybe this is the “real” Trump. That he actually
is a unifier. That he really does have
the country’s best interest at heart. That
maybe it’s time for a “reset.”
How can this be?
How can we forget the relentless assaults against women, Muslims, the
LGBTQ community, people of color, immigrants, refugees, public health, the
environment, public education, and even reality
itself that have been perpetrated by Trump and his team since inauguration
day, and during the entire past year? How
are we so lulled by the siren song of faux-respectability that we ignore the
actual message of the speech (which continues a xenophobic, heteronormative, white
supremacist, militaristic, anti-environmental agenda)? How can we be echoing the calls to “give him
a chance” when the people he has put into cabinet positions are there
specifically to dismantle the institutions of public good? How can we so quickly forget the real damage
this administration has done to this country in just the past six weeks, let
alone the harm planned for the future?
It may be helpful to view these contradictory reactions
by understanding the phenomenon known as the Stockholm Syndrome.
First coined in 1973, the condition derives its name
from the paradoxical situation that arose when hostages of a bank robbery in
Stockholm, Sweden, developed sympathy for their captors and refused to testify
against them in court. Victims
exhibiting Stockholm Syndrome irrationally and inexplicably come to defend
those who abuse them. At first, we may
not understand how this can be. But when
we examine the pattern of mind-games used against the victims, we can start to
see what’s actually happening.
Imagine a kidnapping victim who is periodically
tortured, but is also shown moments of surprising kindness and humanity. When this pattern is repeated enough times, a
kind of brainwashing occurs whereby the victim clings to the delusion that
their captor is actually beneficent, even as their wounds and bruises say
otherwise. Their insistence on defending
their abductor is actually their psyche’s defense mechanism when survival is at
stake.
Or imagine a spouse who sometimes threatens and abuses
their partner, but other times appears charming and conciliatory. In between the times of intimidation and
bullying, the perpetrator punctuates the relationship with moments of grandiose
gestures of goodwill and periods of relative peace. This leads the victim to not only doubt that
the abuse is happening, but also convince themselves that the “real” person
they love is the sweet and kind persona shown on occasion, instead of the cruel
monster who controls the relationship by gaslighting,
manipulation and violence.
When it comes to Trump,
America – do not be fooled. One “nice
guy” speech does not a nice guy make. The
Stockholm Syndrome has begun, and we need to recognize that our collective
fatigue weakens our resistance to the Bannon/Trump agenda.
They know exactly what they are doing. They are faking us out with this “presidential”-sounding
speech, and all of a sudden even some of Trump’s harshest critics seem to be
getting on board. Employing Stockholm
Syndrome tactics is enabling this administration to get away with a great deal
of abuse that would never be tolerated under normal circumstances. We need to be vigilant in identifying this
pattern and recognizing it as a means by which to impose an autocratic rule.
As Dietrich Bonhoeffer said in his book, Ethics (which he wrote while resisting
Hitler and the Third Reich), “It is worse for a liar to tell the truth than for
a lover of truth to lie.” This is because “the liar contaminates everything he says, because everything he says is
meant to further a cause that is false. The liar as liar has endorsed a world
of falsehood and deception, and to focus only on the truth or falsity of his
particular statements is to miss the danger of being caught up in his twisted
world,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
“Dietrich Bonhoeffer,” http://www.iep.utm.edu/bonhoeff/#H2).
In other words, if we
focus only on this one particular speech, we will miss the danger of being
caught up in the twisted world of despotism that the Bannon/Trump
Administration is creating. Make no mistake – this regime is in no way backing
down. Bannon/Trump intend to do
everything they promised, so we should not feel any reassurance from this
speech or any future instances of fake-presidentialism.
Instead, we need to
remember these instructions for surviving an autocracy by Masha Gessen, a
student of Russian totalitarianism:
* Believe
the autocrat. He means what he
says.
* Do not
be taken in by small signs of normality.
* Be
outraged.
* Don’t
make compromises.
On this point, Gessen’s words deserve a full quote, given the
prescience of this piece [“Autocracy:
Rules for Survival”]:, which was written on Nov. 10, 2016, just two
days after the election:
Democrats in Congress will begin to make the
case for cooperation, for the sake of getting anything done—or at least, they
will say, minimizing the damage. Nongovernmental organizations, many of which
are reeling at the moment, faced with a transition period in which there is no
opening for their input, will grasp at chances to work with the new
administration. This will be fruitless—damage cannot be minimized, much less
reversed, when mobilization is the goal—but worse, it will be soul-destroying.
In an autocracy, politics as the art of the possible is in fact utterly amoral.
Those who argue for cooperation will make the case . . . that cooperation is
essential for the future. They will be willfully ignoring the corrupting touch
of autocracy, from which the future must be protected.
The protection of the
future is in our hands. So keep your
eyes open. Understand the psychological
tactics being used against us. Check in
with people you trust who can give you a reality check when the powers seem
to be negating what you know to be true.
And keep reminding each other that the Stockholm Syndrome is already at
work and must be resisted.
The Rev. Dr. Leah Schade is the Assistant Professor of Preaching and Worship at Lexington Theological Seminary (KY) and an ordained Lutheran minister (ELCA), though the views expressed in this post are her own and do not necessarily reflect the institutions she serves. She is the author of the book Creation Crisis Preaching: Ecology, Theology and the Pulpit (Chalice Press, 2015).
